I heard, today, for the second time that a girl from Cardiff was murdered by two Thai fishermen.
Perhaps you're not familier with the story. The BBC have been reporting on it, I am not about to enter their entire report series, bar this; "Two Thai fishermen have been sentenced to death for the rape and murder of 21-year-old Miss Horton, from Cardiff."
The two perpetraitors of this crime, two fishermen, were reportedly watching pornography before they ended up raping, and beating Miss Horton. Not satisfied with violating her, and beating her, she was then dragged out to sea. Where she drowned.
She was violated, beaten and drowned. I don't think I, even with my over active imagination, could imagine a more humiliating, dispicable means of death. However. This is not the point, in a sense.
The two fishermen are allowed to appeal against the judgement. The judgement of death by lethal injection. I understand that people should be allowed to fight for their life. I agree with it. Do these two fishermen deserve the right to appeal against the sentence? They brutalised, humilated and killed a girl of twenty one years. They did this without being intoxicated. They were smiling when they were taken from the bus. They smiled for the cameras. Where is the remorse in smiles, where is the reason to allow them their appeal?
Why should murderers, who murdered a young, innoccent girl be allowed this right?
Should they be granted the same rights as everyone else, after they've demonstrated no remorse, no apparent sorrow, nothing.
I cannot come up with a good reason. Not one.
Wednesday, January 18, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

0 comments:
Post a Comment